¿Neumonía redonda o hallazgo casual? / Round pneumonia or incidental finding?

El diagnóstico diferencial de las neumonías redondas es amplio y engloba enfermedades infecciosas, neoplásicas y congénitas. La paciente que se presenta a continuación fue diagnosticada de una neumonía redonda con una clínica e imagen radiológica compatible. Sin embargo, el diagnóstico definitivo fue una malformación vascular. Este caso permite reflexionar sobre la importancia de valorar distintitos diagnósticos ante una condensación redondeada y sobre la necesidad o no de realizar una radiografía de control en estos casos. Además, lo más original del caso radica en el tratamiento que recibió para la malformación vascular, que no estaba descrito previamente: el propranolol (AU)

The differential diagnosis of round pneumonia is broad and includes infectious, malignant, and congenital diseases. The patient presented below received a diagnosis of round pneumonia based on compatible clinical and radiological findings; however, the definitive diagnosis was a vascular malformation. This case allows us to reflect on the importance of considering alternative diagnoses in the presence of round opacities in the lung and when performance of a follow-up X-ray is or not required in such cases. In addition, the most original aspect of this case lies in the treatment provided for the vascular malformation, which has not been previously described: propranolol. (AU)

Is exercise and electrostimulation effective in improving muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness in children with cystic fibrosis and mild-to-moderate pulmonary impairment?: Randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on resistance-training programs for cystic fibrosis (CF) is limited and the possible benefits of the addition of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a supervised resistance-training program, associated or not with NMES, on muscle strength, aerobic fitness, lung function and quality of life in children with CF presenting mild-to-moderate pulmonary impairment. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial including CF patients aged between 6 and 17years. Subjects were randomly allocated to control (CON); exercise (EX); or exercise and NMES (EX + NMES) groups, and evaluated at baseline and at the end of an 8-week individualized exercise-program (3 days/week, 60min/session). NMES was applied in the quadriceps and the interscapular region, simultaneously to the exercises. CON group followed the CF team recommendations. The main outcome measures were lung function, cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, quality of life and muscle strength. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients, aged 12.6 ± 3.0 years, were analyzed. No significant interactions were found for cardiorespiratory fitness. Functional capacity presented significant differences, indicating a better performance in both EX and EX + NMES. No significant changes between groups were seen for quality of life and lung function. As for muscle strength, EX and EX + NMES presented large effect sizes and significant differences, compared to CON, for quadriceps (p = 0.004, η2p = 0.401), pectoral (p = 0.001, η2p = 0.487), dorsal (p = 0.009, η2p = 0.333) and handgrip (p = 0.028, η2p = 0.278). CONCLUSION: A resistance exercise-training program led to improvements in muscle strength and functional capacity in CF patients with mild-to-moderate pulmonary impairment. The addition of NMES to the training program resulted in no extra favorable effects.

Toward a Biological, Psychological and Familial Approach of Eating Disorders at Onset: Case-Control ANOBAS Study.

Eating disorders (ED) are considered as heterogeneous disorders with a complex multifactor etiology that involves biological and environmental interaction. Objective: The aim was to identify specific ED bio-psychological-familial correlates at illness onset. Methods: A case-control (1:1) design was applied, which studied 50 adolescents diagnosed with ED at onset (12-17 years old) and their families, paired by age and parents' socio-educational level with three control samples (40 with an affective disorder, 40 with asthma, and 50 with no pathology) and their respective families. Biological, psychological, and familial correlates were assessed using interviews, standardized questionnaires, and a blood test. Results: After performing conditional logistic regression models for each type of variable, those correlates that showed to be specific for ED were included in a global exploratory model (R 2 = 0.44). The specific correlates identified associated to the onset of an ED were triiodothyronine (T3) as the main specific biological correlate; patients' drive for thinness, perfectionism and anxiety as the main psychological correlates; and fathers' emotional over-involvement and depression, and mothers' anxiety as the main familial correlates. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to use three specific control groups assessed through standardized interviews, and to collect a wide variety of data at the illness onset. This study design has allowed to explore which correlates, among those measured, were specific to EDs; finding that perfectionism and family emotional over-involvement, as well as the T3 hormone were relevant to discern ED cases at the illness onset from other adolescents with or without a concurrent pathology.

Effects of a Short-Term Resistance-Training Program on Heart Rate Variability in Children With Cystic Fibrosis-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) affects the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and exercise in healthy children modulates the interaction between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a short-term resistance exercise program on heart rate variability (HRV) in children and adolescents with CF. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was carried out in children diagnosed with CF aged 6-18 years. Individuals were divided into two groups: control (CON) and resistance-training (EX). Individuals in the EX group completed an individualized guided resistance program (5-RM-60-80%) for 8 weeks (3 sessions of 60 min/week). Upper and lower limbs exercises (seated bench press, seated lateral row, and leg press) were used. HRV was measured using a Suunto watch with subjects in lying position. Results: Nineteen subjects (13 boys) were included (CON = 11; and EX = 8). Mean age was 12.2 ± 3.3, FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in the first second) z-score was 1.72 ± 1.54 and peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) 42.7 ± 7.4 mL.Kg-1.min-1. Exercise induced significant changes in the frequency-domain variables, including a decrease in LF power (p = 0.001, d = 0.98) and LF/HF ratio (p = 0.020, d = 0.92), and an increase in HF power (p = 0.001, d = -0.97), compared to the CON group. No significant changes were found for time-domain variables, although increases with a moderate effect size were seen for SDNN (p = 0.152, d = -0.41) and RMSSD (p = 0.059, d = -0.49) compared to the CON group. Conclusion: A short-term resistance exercise-training program was able to modulate HRV in children and adolescents with CF presenting mild to moderate lung function impairment and good physical condition. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04293926.

Modelo de interiorización y exteriorización para explicar el inicio de la psicopatología de los trastornos alimentarios en la adolescencia / An internalizing and externalizing model to explain the psychopathology onset of the eating disorders at adolescence

La etiología de los trastornos del comportamiento alimentario (TCA) es compleja y múltiples modelos han intentado conceptualizarla. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si los comportamientos interiorizados y exteriorizados son factores de riesgo generales de psicopatología o específicos de los TCA y que componentes sintomatológicos del TCA están relacionados con estos comportamientos. Para ello, se utilizó un diseño transversal caso-control para comparar los TCA de inicio (n = 50) con tres grupos de control: un grupo con patología psiquiátrica (trastornos depresivos [TD], n = 40), otro con patología psicosomática (asma, n = 40) y un grupo control sin patología (n = 50). La muestra está compuesta por 180 mujeres adolescentes de 12-18 años y sus familias emparejadas por edad y estatus socioeconómico. Los resultados obtenidos indican que la interiorización es un factor de riesgo general para la psicopatología de TCA y TD, y que en los TCA está asociada específicamente con la obsesión por la delgadez, la ineficacia, la conciencia interoceptiva, la depresión, la ansiedad rasgo y la sintomatología obsesivo-compulsiva. Así, se entiende la elevada comorbilidad de los TCA con otros comportamientos interiorizados

The etiology of eating disorders (ED) is complex, and multiple models have attempted to conceptualize it. The objective of this study was to determine whether internalizing and externalizing behaviors are general proximal risk factors for psychopathology or specific for ED, and which symptomatic components of ED are related to these behaviors. Hence, a cross-case-control design was used to compare eating disorders at onset (n = 50) with three control groups: a group with psychiatric pathologies (depressive disorders [DD], n = 40), a group with psychosomatic pathology (asthma, n = 40), and a control group without pathologies (n = 50). The entire sample is made up of 180 adolescent women aged 12-18 years and their families matched by age and socioeconomic status. The results obtained indicate that internalization is a general risk factor for the psychopathology of ED and mood disorders, and that in ED it is specifically associated with a drive for thinness, ineffectiveness, interoceptive awareness, depression, trait-anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptomatology. Thus, the high comorbidity of ED is associated mainly with other internalizing behaviors

Effect of a combined exercise program on physical fitness, lung function, and quality of life in patients with controlled asthma and exercise symptoms: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Asthmatic patients may benefit from exercise training, although the effects of a combined aerobic and resistance training program are still poorly investigated in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of a combined exercise training (resistance and aerobic) program on aerobic fitness, lung function, asthma control and quality of life in a group of mild-moderate asthmatic children with exercise symptoms. METHODS: This was a 12-week randomized controlled trial including children and adolescents diagnosed with mild-moderate asthma and presenting exercise-induced symptoms. The intervention group (IG) performed the exercise training (resistance and aerobic) 3 days/week, for 60 minutes. The control group (CG) followed routine clinical orientations. The main outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, lung function, quality of life, asthma control, and functional tests after 3 months of the intervention. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (IG = 25 and CG = 28) with a mean age of 11.5 ± 2.6 years were included. No significant differences were found between groups regarding lung function, asthma control, quality of life, and functional tests. Ventilatory equivalent for oxygen consumption at ventilatory threshold (P = .025; ηp2 = 0.083), peak oxygen consumption (P = .008; ηp2 = 0.116) and test duration (P = .014; ηp2 = 0.1) presented greater improvements in the IG. In addition, improvements were observed in leg press (P < .001; ηp2 = 0.36), hamstring curl (P = .001; ηp2 = 0.217), high row (P = .003; ηp2 = .167), low row (P = .009; ηp2 = 0.128) and quadriceps leg extension (P = .015; ηp2 = 0.108) in the IG. CONCLUSION: Combined exercise training (resistance and aerobic) improved cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength in children and adolescents with controlled asthma and exercise symptoms.

Bacteria from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with suspected chronic lower respiratory tract infection: results from a multi-center, cross-sectional study in Spain.

This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of bacteria isolated from Spanish children with suspected chronic lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) for whom bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was indicated. BAL fluid (BALF) was collected from 191 children (aged ≥ 6 months to < 6 years, with persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms, non-responders to usual treatment) and cultured. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) were also obtained and cultured to assess concordance of BALF and NPS findings in the same patient. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis were identified from BALF with a bacterial load indicative of infection (> 104 colony-forming units/mL) in 10.5, 8.9, and 6.3% of children, respectively. Clinical characteristics were similar among participants, regardless of positivity status for any of the bacteria. Approximately 26% of pneumococcal isolates were PCV13 serotypes, and 96% of H. influenzae isolates were non-typeable (NTHi). Concordance between BALF and NPS isolates was 51.0% for S. pneumoniae, 52.1% for H. influenzae, and 22.0% for M. catarrhalis. CONCLUSION: S. pneumoniae, NTHi, and M. catarrhalis were the main bacteria detected in BALF and NPS. Children with suspected chronic LRTI may benefit from a vaccine protecting against NTHi. What is Known: • Chronic lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children can cause high morbidity and is a major use of healthcare resources worldwide. Despite this, their etiology or potential preventive measures are poorly assessed. • Bronchoalveolar lavage can be used to determine bacterial etiology of chronic LRTI. What is New: • We used conventional and molecular techniques to show that Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis were present in the LRT of Spanish children with suspected chronic LRTI • Concordance between isolates from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and nasopharyngeal swabs was low, suggesting that samples from the upper respiratory tract could not reliably predict the bacterial etiology of suspected chronic LRTI.

National trends in hospital admissions for asthma exacerbations among pediatric and young adult population in Spain (2002-2010).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the changes in incidence, use of mechanical ventilation, length of stay (LOS), costs and mortality of children (0-15 years) and young adults (16-45 years) hospitalized for asthma exacerbations. METHODS: We included patients hospitalized for asthma exacerbations in Spain from 2002 to 2010 (ICD9-CM codes 493.0x-493.9x). The data were collected from the National Hospital Discharge Database (entire population). We calculated the yearly age- and sex-specific incidence rates for each of the two groups. RESULTS: We included a total of 12,038 pediatric patients and 2792 young adults hospitalized for asthma exacerbations. Overall crude incidence decreased from 20.5 to 18.7 admissions per 100.000 inhabitants in the pediatric group (p < 0.05), and from 4.12 to 3.68 admissions per 100.000 inhabitants among young adults, from 2002 to 2010 (p < 0.05). By contrast, we detected a significant increase in the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in both groups. The average LOS decreased during the study period, from 3.71 (SD 2.28) to 3.16 (SD 2.11) days (p < 0.05) among pediatric patients and there were not changes among young adults. During the study period, the mean cost per patient decreased from 1558.53 (SD 443.63) to 1378.41 (SD 472.71) euros in the pediatric group (p < 0.05), while increased from 2183.44 (SD 783.15) to 2564.32 (SD 1933.98) euros among young adults (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a decrease in the incidence of hospital admissions for asthma exacerbations with concomitant increase in use of NIV in asthmatic patients, both pediatric and young adults patients. Although LOS and mean cost have decreased among pediatric patients, they have not changed and increased, respectively, among young adults. A better management of the disease at primary care services may explain the improvement in the incidence and outcomes.

Evaluación de la medición de las resistencias pulmonares por técnica de interrupción / Assessing the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique

Introducción. Las pruebas de función pulmonar permiten objetivar el grado de obstrucción bronquial en sujetos colaboradores. La medición de las resistencias pulmonares por métodos pasivos es muy útil en sujetos no colaboradores. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la aplicabilidad de la medición de resistencias por interrupción (Rint) en la edad pediátrica, valorando su reproducibilidad, fabilidad y exactitud en relación con otras técnicas de medición de resistencias. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal en niños de entre 2 y 18 años, sanos y con patología obstructiva. Se midió la Rint con un aparato portátil y se comparó con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría y pletismografía. Se valoró la reproducibilidad de las mediciones y la infuencia de diferentes variables (uso de mascarilla o boquilla, sujeción de mejillas o uso de pinza nasal). Resultados. De 460 niños (47,6% menores de 7 años) se obtuvieron medidas válidas en el 82,6%. La reproducibilidad fue muy buena (CCI= 0,9412; p < 0,00001), sin encontrar diferencias entre las medidas obtenidas separadas en el tiempo (0,75 ± 0,3 contra 0,74 ± 0,28; p= 0,435). Ninguno de los factores antes mencionados afectó la reproducibilidad de las medidas. Los valores de resistencia obtenidos por pletismografía y oscilometría fueron superiores a los obtenidos por Rint, con una correlación positiva entre ambos. La correlación con la pletismografía disminuía cuanto mayor era el grado de obstrucción. Conclusiones. La medición de Rint es factible y reproducible, y se correlaciona bien con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría o pletismografía, por lo que sería de utilidad en los pacientes poco colaboradores. En los pacientes obstruidos, podría infraestimar la resistencia, difcultando su uso para el seguimiento de una patología obstructiva moderada-grave o en las pruebas de provocación bronquial.

Introduction. Pulmonary function tests allow an objective assessment of the degree of bronchial obstruction in collaborative subjects. The measurement of airway resistance using passive methods is very helpful in non-collaborative subjects. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of measuring airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in pediatric subjects, determining its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy versus other techniques to measure airway resistance. Material and Methods. Cross-sectional study in healthy children and in children with an obstructive airway disease, all aged 2-18 years old. The Rint was measured using a portable device and results were compared to airway resistance measured by oscillometry and plethysmography. The reproducibility of measurements and the infuence of the different outcome measures (use of mask or mouthpiece, cheek support, or nose clip) were assessed. Results. Valid measurements were obtained in 82.6% of 460 children (47.6% younger than 7 years old). Reproducibility was very good (ICC= 0.9412; p <0.00001), and no differences were found among the measurements obtained at separate time intervals (0.75 ± 0.3 versus 0.74 ± 0.28; p= 0.435). None of the factors indicated before had an effect on the reproducibility of measurements. Resistance values obtained by plethysmography and oscillometry were higher than those obtained using the Rint, with a positive correlation between them. The higher the degree of airway obstruction, the worse the correlation with plethysmography. Conclusions. The Rint measurement is a plausible and reproducible technique, and has an adequate correlation with the resistance measurements obtained using oscillometry or plethysmography, thus making it useful for non-collaborative patients. In patients with airway obstruction, this technique could underestimate resistance, so it would be a hurdle to use it to follow-up subjects with a moderate to severe obstructive disease or in bronchial challenge tests.

Evaluación de la medición de las resistencias pulmonares por técnica de interrupción / Assessing the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique

Introducción. Las pruebas de función pulmonar permiten objetivar el grado de obstrucción bronquial en sujetos colaboradores. La medición de las resistencias pulmonares por métodos pasivos es muy útil en sujetos no colaboradores. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la aplicabilidad de la medición de resistencias por interrupción (Rint) en la edad pediátrica, valorando su reproducibilidad, fabilidad y exactitud en relación con otras técnicas de medición de resistencias. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal en niños de entre 2 y 18 años, sanos y con patología obstructiva. Se midió la Rint con un aparato portátil y se comparó con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría y pletismografía. Se valoró la reproducibilidad de las mediciones y la infuencia de diferentes variables (uso de mascarilla o boquilla, sujeción de mejillas o uso de pinza nasal). Resultados. De 460 niños (47,6% menores de 7 años) se obtuvieron medidas válidas en el 82,6%. La reproducibilidad fue muy buena (CCI= 0,9412; p < 0,00001), sin encontrar diferencias entre las medidas obtenidas separadas en el tiempo (0,75 ± 0,3 contra 0,74 ± 0,28; p= 0,435). Ninguno de los factores antes mencionados afectó la reproducibilidad de las medidas. Los valores de resistencia obtenidos por pletismografía y oscilometría fueron superiores a los obtenidos por Rint, con una correlación positiva entre ambos. La correlación con la pletismografía disminuía cuanto mayor era el grado de obstrucción. Conclusiones. La medición de Rint es factible y reproducible, y se correlaciona bien con las resistencias medidas por oscilometría o pletismografía, por lo que sería de utilidad en los pacientes poco colaboradores. En los pacientes obstruidos, podría infraestimar la resistencia, difcultando su uso para el seguimiento de una patología obstructiva moderada-grave o en las pruebas de provocación bronquial.(AU)

Introduction. Pulmonary function tests allow an objective assessment of the degree of bronchial obstruction in collaborative subjects. The measurement of airway resistance using passive methods is very helpful in non-collaborative subjects. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of measuring airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in pediatric subjects, determining its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy versus other techniques to measure airway resistance. Material and Methods. Cross-sectional study in healthy children and in children with an obstructive airway disease, all aged 2-18 years old. The Rint was measured using a portable device and results were compared to airway resistance measured by oscillometry and plethysmography. The reproducibility of measurements and the infuence of the different outcome measures (use of mask or mouthpiece, cheek support, or nose clip) were assessed. Results. Valid measurements were obtained in 82.6% of 460 children (47.6% younger than 7 years old). Reproducibility was very good (ICC= 0.9412; p <0.00001), and no differences were found among the measurements obtained at separate time intervals (0.75 ± 0.3 versus 0.74 ± 0.28; p= 0.435). None of the factors indicated before had an effect on the reproducibility of measurements. Resistance values obtained by plethysmography and oscillometry were higher than those obtained using the Rint, with a positive correlation between them. The higher the degree of airway obstruction, the worse the correlation with plethysmography. Conclusions. The Rint measurement is a plausible and reproducible technique, and has an adequate correlation with the resistance measurements obtained using oscillometry or plethysmography, thus making it useful for non-collaborative patients. In patients with airway obstruction, this technique could underestimate resistance, so it would be a hurdle to use it to follow-up subjects with a moderate to severe obstructive disease or in bronchial challenge tests.(AU)

Assessing the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary function tests allow an objective assessment of the degree of bronchial obstruction in collaborative subjects. The measurement of airway resistance using passive methods is very helpful in non-collaborative subjects. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of measuring airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in pediatric subjects, determining its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy versus other techniques to measure airway resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in healthy children and in children with an obstructive airway disease, all aged 2-18 years old. The Rint was measured using a portable device and results were compared to airway resistance measured by oscillometry and plethysmography. The reproducibility of measurements and the infuence of the different outcome measures (use of mask or mouthpiece, cheek support, or nose clip) were assessed. RESULTS: Valid measurements were obtained in 82.6% of 460 children (47.6% younger than 7 years old). Reproducibility was very good (ICC= 0.9412; p <0.00001), and no differences were found among the measurements obtained at separate time intervals (0.75 ± 0.3 versus 0.74 ± 0.28; p= 0.435). None of the factors indicated before had an effect on the reproducibility of measurements. Resistance values obtained by plethysmography and oscillometry were higher than those obtained using the Rint, with a positive correlation between them. The higher the degree of airway obstruction, the worse the correlation with plethysmography. CONCLUSIONS: The Rint measurement is a plausible and reproducible technique, and has an adequate correlation with the resistance measurements obtained using oscillometry or plethysmography, thus making it useful for non-collaborative patients. In patients with airway obstruction, this technique could underestimate resistance, so it would be a hurdle to use it to follow-up subjects with a moderate to severe obstructive disease or in bronchial challenge tests.

Assessing the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique. / Assessing the measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary function tests allow an objective assessment of the degree of bronchial obstruction in collaborative subjects. The measurement of airway resistance using passive methods is very helpful in non-collaborative subjects. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of measuring airway resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in pediatric subjects, determining its reproducibility, reliability and accuracy versus other techniques to measure airway resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in healthy children and in children with an obstructive airway disease, all aged 2-18 years old. The Rint was measured using a portable device and results were compared to airway resistance measured by oscillometry and plethysmography. The reproducibility of measurements and the infuence of the different outcome measures (use of mask or mouthpiece, cheek support, or nose clip) were assessed. RESULTS: Valid measurements were obtained in 82.6

of 460 children (47.6

younger than 7 years old). Reproducibility was very good (ICC= 0.9412; p <0.00001), and no differences were found among the measurements obtained at separate time intervals (0.75 ± 0.3 versus 0.74 ± 0.28; p= 0.435). None of the factors indicated before had an effect on the reproducibility of measurements. Resistance values obtained by plethysmography and oscillometry were higher than those obtained using the Rint, with a positive correlation between them. The higher the degree of airway obstruction, the worse the correlation with plethysmography. CONCLUSIONS: The Rint measurement is a plausible and reproducible technique, and has an adequate correlation with the resistance measurements obtained using oscillometry or plethysmography, thus making it useful for non-collaborative patients. In patients with airway obstruction, this technique could underestimate resistance, so it would be a hurdle to use it to follow-up subjects with a moderate to severe obstructive disease or in bronchial challenge tests.

Valoración externa de las recomendaciones de la GEMA2009 por un panel multiprofesional de expertos en asma / External Assessment of the GEMA2009 Recommendations by a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel on Asthma

ObjetivosValorar el grado de acuerdo de un panel de expertos en asma de diferentes especialidades con las recomendaciones que propone la Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma (GEMA) 2009.Material y métodosEl estudio se efectuó en 4 fases: 1) constitución del comité científico formado por los 9 coordinadores de GEMA2009, para la selección de las recomendaciones de la Guía que conforman el cuestionario Delphi del estudio (56 ítems); 2) selección de un panel estatal multicéntrico con 74 expertos en asma de todas las especialidades implicadas en la Guía (neumólogos, alergólogos, médicos de familia, otorrinolaringólogos, y especialistas de pediatría); 3) encuesta Delphi en 2 rondas (con valoración personal de cada ítem mediante escala Likert de 5 puntos), por correo electrónico, con informe a panelistas de resultados intermedios; y 4) análisis y discusión de resultados por el comité científico del proyecto.ResultadosSe apreció un consenso de criterio en 49 de las 56 cuestiones analizadas ya en la primera ronda. Tras la interacción del panel, se lograron consensuar 53 ítems de la encuesta, en el sentido favorable al acuerdo del panel con las recomendaciones GEMA. En una de las cuestiones no consensuadas, sobre indicación de inmunoterapia en asma alérgica, se apreció una significativa disparidad de opinión entre especialidades. En otra, sobre las medidas de control ambiental en alergia a ácaros, se apreció una manifiesta oposición del panel (55%), y en la última, sobre la necesidad de cambiar de trabajo en pacientes con síndrome reactivo de disfunción de la vía aérea, se observó una ausencia significativa de criterio establecido en buena parte de los encuestados (40% expresan «ni de acuerdo, ni en desacuerdo»)(AU)

ConclusionesLa valoración externa por expertos en asma de diferentes especialidades constata un elevado nivel de acuerdo profesional con las recomendaciones formuladas en GEMA2009 (93%). Probablemente el desacuerdo evidenciado en 3 de las recomendaciones reflejan la escasez de evidencias, o su gran variabilidad, para establecer recomendaciones consistentes. Estas cuestiones podrían representar áreas susceptibles de un mayor esfuerzo investigador futuro(AU)

ObjectivesTo assess the level of agreement on the GEMA 2009 clinical recommendations by a Spanish expert panel on asthma.Materials and methodsThe study was divided into four stages: 1) establishment of a 9 member scientific committee (GEMA authors) for selection of GEMA recommendations to use in the survey; 2) formation of a panel of 74 professionals with expertise in this field (pulmonologists, allergists, family doctors, ear, nose and throat and paediatric specialists); 3) Delphi survey in two rounds, sent by mail, with intermediate processing of opinions and a report to the panel members; and 4) analysis and discussion of results for the Scientific Committee.ResultsSeventy four participants completed the two rounds of survey. During the first round, a consensus was reached in 49 out of 56 questions analysed. Following discussion by the panel, the consensus was increased to a total of 53 items in the survey. With respect to the remaining questions, Insufficient consensus was obtained on the rest of the questions, due to differing views between sub-specialists, or lack of criteria by most of the experts.ConclusionsThe external analysis by asthma experts from different specialities showed a high level of professional agreement with the GEMA 2009 recommendations in Spain (96.5%). The disagreement shown in three recommendations reflect the lack of a high level evidence. These issues represent areas of interest for future research(AU)

[External assessment of the GEMA2009 recommendations by a multidisciplinary expert panel on asthma]. / Valoración externa de las recomendaciones de la GEMA2009 por un panel multiprofesional de expertos en asma.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of agreement on the GEMA 2009 clinical recommendations by a Spanish expert panel on asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was divided into four stages: 1) establishment of a 9 member scientific committee (GEMA authors) for selection of GEMA recommendations to use in the survey; 2) formation of a panel of 74 professionals with expertise in this field (pulmonologists, allergists, family doctors, ear, nose and throat and paediatric specialists); 3) Delphi survey in two rounds, sent by mail, with intermediate processing of opinions and a report to the panel members; and 4) analysis and discussion of results for the Scientific Committee. RESULTS: Seventy four participants completed the two rounds of survey. During the first round, a consensus was reached in 49 out of 56 questions analysed. Following discussion by the panel, the consensus was increased to a total of 53 items in the survey. With respect to the remaining questions, Insufficient consensus was obtained on the rest of the questions, due to differing views between sub-specialists, or lack of criteria by most of the experts. CONCLUSIONS: The external analysis by asthma experts from different specialities showed a high level of professional agreement with the GEMA 2009 recommendations in Spain (96.5%). The disagreement shown in three recommendations reflect the lack of a high level evidence. These issues represent areas of interest for future research.

The monitoring of bronchial inflammation by bioimpedance

No disponible

No disponible